I have received my next American Express statement since my earlier post about the discovery of fraudulent charges. American Express has not credited my account for the December 11, 2007 Paradise Web charge for $9.59. In addition, the January 1, 2008 charge by VALLJRSX VALL-JRSX for $12.24 I discovered by checking my account online also remains on the statement in spite of advising American Express by phone on January 3, 2008 that both charges were fraudulent. I logged onto my account again today to determine if American Express had corrected my account after the date of this most recent statement. It had not. However, on or after January 14th a credit had been given in the amount of $9.45 for a November 7, 2007 charge by E NAT NATALIYA MAKOVI. I can’t believe I missed that one! When I later called American Express I stupidly failed to ask why and how that unreported fraudulent charge got refunded. After thinking about it this evening, I’m wondering if American Express is handling the matter as a disputed charge rather than a fraudulent charge, and did in fact give Paradise Web notice as today’s AmEx rep told me (see below). Does this development prove MGD’s belief that all these companies are tightly linked as he reported in the DSL Reports thread? That would mean that E NAT NATALIYA MAKOVI was tipped off by Paradise Web and took pre-emptive action refunding the money in order to avoid chargeback fees. But, since American Express failed to include VALLJRSX as a fraudulent charge when I first reported it on January 3, why didn’t VALLJRSX also avail itself of an opportunity to take pre-emptive action? Anyway, moving on to today’s discussions with American Express.
Fearing my report of fraudulent charges by Paradise Web and VALLJRSX had fallen through the cracks, I called American Express again today. The first customer rep I spoke with advised an investigation had been initiated for the Paradise Web charge but not the VALLJRSX charge. He also said the Paradise Web investigation would take six to eight weeks to complete, and that Paradise Web would be notified I was contesting the charges. Whereupon, I vehemently once again told today’s rep these were not disputed charges but fraudulent charges and I did not want Paradise Web to have an opportunity to refund my money without incurring chargeback fees. I told the rep I spoke with on January 3 the same thing. Today’s rep, as did the one I spoke with on January 3rd, immediately transferred me to a rep in the fraud department.
Once again, I retold the entire problem from the beginning through today. The fraud rep confirmed that the Paradise Web investigation was “still pending”, and added VALLJRSX to the case number. He also stated (as did the fraud rep I spoke with on January 3) that I would receive a letter from American Express within three to four weeks of the original notification of fraud charges. Based on my experience last year with Visa, that means more paperwork for me to fill out and return to American Express. If that’s what it takes, sobeit. I specifically asked whether or not these criminals would incur chargeback fees. He said they would, but I’m skeptical what good that will do based on MGD’s report of a “reversal agreement” American Express has with these yahoos. I also told the fraud rep that I’ve been following tons of reports on the web of these same fraudulent charges since the beginning of January, and that it’s obvious this is a problem that, to date, involves only AmEx cardholders. Neither he nor any other AmEx rep I’ve spoken with has acknowledged in any way, shape, or form whether or not these companies are in fact being investigated as criminal organizations. While they assure me the charges are being investigated as fraudulent, I’m not confident yet that they are.
When I first Googled VALLJRSX on January 2, the only return was to Chris Jupin’s post which then led me to the thread at DSL Reports. Now there are 40 web pages. On January 14th, one day after my original post about fraud, this insignificant little blog received 17 hits from search terms ranging from “VALLJRSX” to “fraud charge amex direct MKTG”. Since then, this blog has continued to receive an average of seven search term referrals every day. I can only imagine the number of hits the DSL Reports thread and Chris Jupin’s post are receiving. No doubt the web reports and web traffic only account for a tiny, tiny fraction of the calls American Express is receiving. On top of that there are sure to be people who never even caught the fraudulent charges on their statements, just as I didn’t catch the one in November. I’d like to believe that with so many reports of AmEx cardholders being hit with the same fraudulent charges that AmEx has become acutely aware it has a serious problem on its hands, and is willing to take the necessary steps to track down and prosecute the thieves. Again, I have my doubts.
To anyone reading this post, I’m sorry if it’s confusing and has more typos than usual. I’m aggravated. I’m tired.